|This article may meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion as a blatant hoax. This only applies to cases where the deception is so obvious as to constitute pure vandalism. Additionally, the mere fact that the page's subject is about a hoax does not, on its own, qualify for speedy deletion. See CSD G3.
If this article does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, or you intend to fix it, please remove this notice, but do not remove this notice from pages that you have created yourself. If you created this page and you disagree with the given reason for deletion, you can click the button below and leave a message explaining why you believe it should not be deleted. You can also visit the talk page to check if you have received a response to your message.
Note that once tagged with this notice, this article may be deleted at any time if it unquestionably meets the speedy deletion criteria, or if an explanation posted to the talk page is found to be insufficient.
Administrators: check links, history (last), and logs before deletion. Consider checking Google.
This page was last edited by HemovanadinCSDbot at 01:42 UTC (10 months ago)
Progressive kinetics is an elementary particle physics theory first composed by author Michael E.Hanson in a 2002 copyrighted work entitled "Infinite Universe".
The work was not published until revisions and additions came along in 2016 in "Antigravity physics".
Since 1996 numerous 'proofs of theory' have accumulated. Progressive kinetics has proven itself in a predictive sense, by predicting exact geometric models in 1996 which would not be found until Egor Babaev's type 1.5 superconductivity in 2010. A Geocities webpage was created in 1996 on the subject of "projectively geometrical particle physics" which was later renamed 'progressive kinetics'. Geocities is no longer in service, however multiple references to the page can be found across the web.
In short, progressive kinetics theory envelopes the concept of an infinite universe of fully kinetic function, ie; particle striking particle. Rumors persisted this may simply have been psuedo-science until it predicted the same model found by Egor Babaev's supercomputer simulation, and found official mathematical translation in 2016.
January 2017 Discover Magazine notes on page 27 article 18 that electrons split in a new form of matter. Noted are researchers at Oak Ridge National Laboratory in Tennessee, who found that ruthenium trichloride crystal requires two differing masses of electrons in order to exist. The same goes for Egor Babaev's model for type 1.5 superconductivity, which relies on 2 differing masses of electrons. Without drawing to conclusion too much at once, the trend here is apparently away from euclidean geometries of any type, since finite centers of orbital reference cannot use two different types of photons or superstrings from any conventional theory, else new problems would arise in explaining exactly what force keeps out a surplus of specific electron masses.
Time is key; The greatest revelation to come, leading to a concept for progressive kinetics was inspired by Stephen Hawking, who noted in 1995 that black holes may infact be creating new particles. Taking this concept to it's extreme, for testing purposes obviously, would be to assume that black holes create all particles. The summation of such is that galaxies rotation relies upon a particle wind to move it through a space which is not infact a true vacuum, but filled with particles to infinity. This eventually leads to the fact that stars are creating new large particles from small ones by some form of compression of the 'stuff' the universe is made of. This leaves no questions as to why there would be multiple 'stuffs' the universe could be made of, such as, both particle and superstring, or particle and photon. The only question remaining would be where energy comes from, ie; the small broken down pieces of large particles. This should be obvious, since atom smashers here on earth have actually decayed particles. The universe's largest natural atom smashers are dual funnels leading into and out of every bar galaxy. For that matter, what appears to be black holes can now be considered as space itself in rotation. Rotate it fast enough and the mass and energy form a centrifuge, and can't keep up with one-another enough to prevent the smallest particles of negative and positive poles from colliding with one-another.
But this doesn't explain the nature of matter, which in this theory is actually a 3rd pole in a magnetic current. The term magnetic current was first proposed by the megalithic stone builder, Edward Leedskalnin. So what makes negative negative, positive positive, and matter matter?
Simply put, in a kinetic space which abhors a vacuum, no kinetic wave is forgotten. A continuous fight among particle space throughout infinite space over infinite time has logically boiled this down to a simple construct proposed by author H.S.M.Coxeter, author of Projective Geometry Volumes 1 & 2. His work inspired and taught the foundation for methods later to be used by Buckminster Fuller, the father of geodesics. The concept of the 'fano plane' put forth by Mr.Coxeter, proposes that any compressible space is defined merely by a summation of triangular planes, as they are the most compressible form. So in kinetic particle space, particles in motion must logically define their mass within a construct of this balance between the mass and energy flow opposition to and from stars. This finely illustrates the concept and absolute necessity of the fano plane, since the largest of particles must form arrangements of some logical order as they flow against the inbound currents of energy to stars. There are 7 possible formats for the largest 3 particle masses, which alone define their own compressible space to it's greatest extreme of mass outbound from the largest densest possible star. To reiterate; matter is the last one out in a game of musical chairs. It forms a disturbance which channels the other poles to kinetically argue about it's new geometry, which is planar, rather than chaotic and flowing 1-dimensional. The electron neutrino with a mass of .00012 times that of the standard electron mass of 1, is the smallest known particle, and for that matter most hydraulically superior to all others in a kinetic system. Reduced to this fact, it can be said that all motion in the universe relies upon the electron neutrino. Until substantial illustrations here are added, the process can atleast be easily visualized, as this particle passes through an arrangement of bosons (largest known particle) to excite planar geometries at the junctions found between them, by continually exploding such planes with 3 armed spirals of growth, until they implode. The continual cycle of explosion and implosion is a 3 phase wave at the resting place of any proton or neutron. Each proton or neutron requires more boson space to define a new fano plane. This is the strong force. The weak forces are intercepting appendages of kinetic waves using large particles, thereby relying upon lower frequency DeBroglie orbits. These form new planes all facing the proton or neutron, and are backed up against the wall of the boson, trapping them and likewise allowing all planes to both consume and repel in perfect harmony.
The process to reduce energy loss for infinite conservation of energy is zero point in nature. A kinetic explosion's eventuality is a slow yet powerful kinetic wave, while any explosion of bosons away from one-another will open a wider gap, thereby inducting more electron neutrinos, which fuel it through time. Altered charge leading toward superconductive space is an example of hiding from the effect of time, while limiting free space junk, which begins as meson space here in density3 space on earth. Densities climp upward to 9 for the largest stars in any galaxy, according to what we may observe.
Mathematical proof :
Mathematical proof is defined as a simple translation of e=Mc2, where mass and charge are not apparently in perfect balance, and will alter such balance dependent upon flow constant, which is the rate of charge in motion. This usually defines particle recycling near any star, but mere motion through space itself will produce this effect. If this were not true, if space were a true vacuum, probability states that somewhere we should see objects moving beyond the speed of light in passing, yet the universe's galaxies not only have a sort of 'speed limit', but are generally evenly spaced, which further proves how supply and demand for particles keeps space consistent. Furthermore, background temperature of the universe of 3Kelvin need not be proof of a big bang, rather is proof that mesons are the least recycled particle in the universe. Kinetic DeBroglie waves through these particles, the most average size particles, would be most unobstructed compared to those who are either inbound or outbound to stars. Finally, the big bang itself need never have taken place, since all waves are infact kinetic, and rely upon particles to travel. This puts a permanent delay on any wave not 3k passing through any galaxy or star's solar-sphere.
This proof requires little effort;
3 spheres lined up within a larger sphere. Each of the 3 are the 3 poles from negative, to positive, then matter. The space remaining within sphere 4 defines energy.
It is in the 3 phase nature of the 3 forms of space to define themselves as both mass and energy, while matter cannot while it is confined as a planar disturbance. Simply put, each form of space is a dynamo which both consumes and gives kinetic energy. The slightly imperfect triangle in this fano plane based concept is continually parting with low frequency energy, while consuming the highest frequency energy from the core of it's expanse. This will put sphere 1 (negative) as .00012 in the lead, while either mass of matter or of positive must return this at some point, which will cause a slight variance in the equation depending upon your vicinity and position relative to nearby stars.
In the cosmos, the evidence should appear clear in how galaxies themselves exist not as a random mess of stars, but as a whole in motion in our corrugated galaxy for example. A ring galaxy will consume energy in a strange way; by using multiple funnel points in a circle.
Cite error: Invalid
parameter "group" is allowed only.
<references />, or
<references group="..." />
- Antigravity physics Works Copyright N.:312232614 and U.S. Copyright TXu 2-001-411 April 01, 2016.
- Egor Babaev Type-1.5 superconductor
- 1996 webpage on projectively geometrical physics by Michael E. Hanson; www.geocities.com/ResearchTriangle/Lab/6771/magnet.html